Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tilwith Di Girolami vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Girolami vs Peeters analysis and find out who is favored!
Tilwith Di Girolami vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Girolami 1 - 0 Peeters
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Girolami has won 41.73% of points on their second serve, while Peeters has won 40.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Girolami, in recent form, has won 58.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peeters has won 57.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.87% and 42.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Girolami has saved 51.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peeters has saved 56.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Girolami has won 46.81% of matches played (W/L 22/ 25), with Peeters winning 50.94% (W/L 27/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Girolami has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 30/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Girolami has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.43% of matches (W/L 18/ 17), where as Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Girolami winning 1 times and Peeters being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Girolami winning 2 and Peeters winning 0. The last match between Girolami and Peeters was at the W15 Alkmaar, 21-06-2022, First, Clay with Tilwith Di Girolami getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Girolami and Peeters have played a deciding set 0 times, with Girolami winning 0 times and Peeters 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Girolami winning 0, and Peeters 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Girolami has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.53 while Peeters has played against players with an average rank of 123.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Girolami has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peeters has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Girolami has converted 43.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peeters has converted 48.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
867
Rank
625
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
51% (69-66)
Career Total W/L
56% (75-58)
46% (13-15)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tilwith Di Girolami | Anouck Vrancken Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:0 | 2:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (42/76) | 67% (52/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (30/42) | 54% (28/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (15/34) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (39/78) | 41% (31/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tilwith Di Girolami | Anouck Vrancken Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (13/15) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/34) | 53% (27/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (313/306) | 54% (241/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 138 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:32 | 1:41:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.46 | 138.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1400/1868) | 60% (857/1417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (768/1400) | 62% (533/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (195/468) | 41% (227/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (124/288) | 49% (93/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (933/1938) | 49% (641/1318) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (11/11) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 9% (11/1) |
Tilwith Di Girolami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
75 of
98)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Giraldi Requena
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
83%
(
59 of
71)
1
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
84%
(
53 of
63)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
53%
(
36 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Laia Petretic
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Zi Ying Ruan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Tilda Hessleryd
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Cecilie Wiche
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
16
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Girolami Vs Peeters Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
